Market traction and fundraising, on their own, are not enough.
Without real product market fit, growth and capital raising lose much of their meaning.
A startup can grow fast, close significant funding rounds, and show apparently positive metrics even without product market fit. But when the deep alignment between product and market is missing, those results tend to be temporary, fragile, and hard to sustain over time.
For any product market fit startup, fit is not a nice-to-have milestone. It is the condition that makes growth durable, scalable, and economically sound.
In venture building—especially in deep tech and Physical AI—distinguishing between signals of activity and signals of real value is not a theoretical exercise. It is a strategic choice. And that choice often determines whether a startup compounds or stalls.
A product market fit startup exists when a product solves a real problem for a clearly defined market, generating demand that is authentic, repeatable, and sustainable.

The most widely cited definition comes from Marc Andreessen, who described product market fit as:
“Being in a good market with a product that can satisfy that market.”
Simple as it sounds, this definition is often misunderstood. Product market fit is not just about the product. It is about the structural relationship between product, market, and perceived value.
It is not a box to check on a roadmap, nor a static achievement. Product market fit is a structural condition that shows up when:
Without product market fit, any growth strategy rests on unstable foundations.
According to Andy Rachleff, one of the first to formalize the concept, product market fit coincides with the validation of a value hypothesis.
Before asking how to grow, a startup must prove:
Only after this value hypothesis is validated does it make sense to work on a growth hypothesis. Growing before that point does not reduce risk—it amplifies uncertainty.
This is a core distinction in any product market fit startup: value first, scale later.
One of the most common mistakes in startups is confusing traction with product market fit.
Traction signals activity:
Product market fit signals value.
As Paul Graham, founder of Y Combinator, has often pointed out, successful startups do not start from forced ideas, but from real needs noticed in the world. A product with product market fit is something people want to use even when it is still imperfect.
Traction, on the other hand, can be induced:
Product market fit cannot.
It appears when the market starts pulling the product, not when the team keeps pushing it.
Another frequent source of confusion is fundraising. Raising capital is often interpreted as market validation. In practice, capital is only an accelerator.
As highlighted in Before Growth by Sam Altman, scaling before achieving product market fit is one of the most dangerous mistakes a startup can make:
“A startup that focuses on growth too early often ends up with a confused product that some users kind of like, masking the underlying problem with growth techniques.”
Fundraising without product market fit tends to:
Without product market fit, capital accelerates in the wrong direction.
In the absence of product market fit, early sales and growth signals are often supported by:
These signals are not useless, but they are not sufficient.
When the push slows down, demand weakens. Growth becomes expensive, fragile, and dependent on constant external input.
A product market fit startup, by contrast, shows different signals:
Several frameworks help assess whether a startup has achieved product market fit. One of the most cited is the 40% test, also known as the Sean Ellis Test, named after Sean Ellis, who formalized it.
The test is qualitative: if at least 40% of users say they would be very disappointed if they could no longer use the product, there is likely a real alignment between product and market.

Other key signals often include:
No single metric is sufficient on its own. Product market fit emerges from the systemic coherence between qualitative and quantitative signals.
A common misconception is that product market fit, once achieved, is permanent. It is not.
Markets evolve. Technologies change. User needs shift. Even startups that once had strong product market fit can lose it if they:
Product market fit must be maintained, not just found.level metrics. It builds value that the market recognizes—before investors do.
Product market fit is what separates a startup that grows from a startup that lasts.
It is the prerequisite for:
A product market fit startup does not chase surface-level metrics. It builds value that the market recognizes—before investors do.
In e-Novia’s venture building approach, product market fit is not an end result. It is a guiding criterion from day one.

This is especially true for deep tech and Physical AI startups, where:
For this reason, e-Novia supports startups and researchers by starting from product market fit and working through:
Only after this alignment does it make sense to talk about growth, fundraising, and scale.
What is product market fit for a startup?
Product market fit is the condition in which a startup’s product solves a real problem for a defined market, generating authentic and sustainable demand over time.
What is the difference between product market fit vs traction?
Traction indicates activity and early adoption. Product market fit indicates real value and persistent demand.
Can a startup grow without product market fit?
Yes, but growth is usually temporary and expensive. Without product market fit, results are rarely durable.
Can fundraising replace product market fit?
No. Capital accelerates what already exists, but it cannot create alignment between product and market.
Discover how e-Novia supports startups and researchers in building product market fit, from early validation to market entry, through its Venture Studio.